[Firewall] Next problem
jimmy at retro-hosting.co.uk
Fri Oct 5 19:50:03 CEST 2012
On 05/10/2012 17:27, Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> On Friday 05 October 2012 11:06:04 Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
>> On Oct 5, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Eli Wapniarski wrote:
>>> On Friday 05 October 2012 09:34:32 Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
>>>> If you want to forward UDP 9987 to your internal host 192.168.0.11 using
>>>> the same port, you *only* need: --
>>>> Note the matching double-quotes, shell script style.
>>>> By also having OPEN_UDP="9987" you are tying to do two different things
>>>> with the same packet.
>>>> So, remove OPEN_UDP="9987" and make sure you have matching double-quotes.
>>> Thanks Lonnie
>>> That did the trick. Does this apply to everythig I forwared or just to
>> Yes, everything. Either you NAT forward the packet (NAT_FORWARD_) to
>> internal hosts or allow the packet (OPEN_) to your local computer running
>> Arno's firewall, not both.
> I will try to configure my firewall as per your suggestion Lonnie. However, I
> gotta ask a dumb question then. How come, when I have the open_tcp configured
> and nat_forward_tcp configured with the same ports everything seems to work
Luck. Maybe TCP port forwards are parsed before the TCP Open ports and
the other way around for UDP
More information about the Firewall